Transcatheter valve-in-valve interventions after aortic root replacement: A systematic review.

Structural valve deterioration after aortic root replacement (ARR) surgery may be treated by transcatheter valve-in-valve (ViV-TAVI) intervention. However, several technical challenges and outcomes are not well described. The aim of the present review was to analyze the outcomes of ViV-TAVI in deteriorated ARR. This review included studies reporting any form of transcatheter valvular intervention in patients with a previous ARR. All forms of ARR were considered, as long as the entire root was replaced. Pubmed, ScienceDirect, SciELO, DOAJ, and Cochrane library databases were searched until September 2023. Overall, 86 patients were included from 31 articles that met our inclusion criteria out of 741 potentially eligible studies. In the entire population, the mean time from ARR to reintervention was 11.0 years (range: 0.33-22). The most frequently performed techniques/grafts for ARR was homograft (67.4%) and the main indication for intervention was aortic regurgitation (69.7%). Twenty-three articles reported no postoperative complications. Six (7.0%) patients required permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) after the ViV-TAVI procedure, and 4 (4.7%) patients had a second ViV-TAVI implant. There were three device migrations (3.5%) and 1 stroke (1.2%). Patients with previous ARR present a high surgical risk. ViV-TAVI can be considered in selected patients, despite unique technical challenges that need to be carefully addressed according to the characteristics of the previous surgery and on computed tomography analysis.

Use of the Win Ratio Analysis in Critical Care Trials.

Composite outcomes are commonly used in critical care trials to estimate the treatment effect of an intervention. A significant limitation of classical analytic approaches is that they assign equal statistical importance to each component in a composite, even if these do not have the same clinical importance (i.e., in a composite of death and organ failure, death is clearly more important). The win ratio (WR) method has been proposed as an alternative for trial outcomes evaluation, as it effectively assesses events based on their clinical relevance (i.e., hierarchical order) by comparing each patient in the intervention group with their counterparts in the control group. This statistical approach is increasingly used in cardiovascular outcome trials. However, WR may be useful to unveil treatment effects also in the critical care setting, because these trials are typically moderately sized, thus limiting the statistical power to detect small differences between groups, and often rely on composite outcomes that include several components of different clinical importance. Notably, the advantages of this approach may be offset by several drawbacks (such as ignoring ties and difficulties in selecting and ranking endpoints) and challenges in appropriate clinical interpretation (i.e., establishing clinical meaningfulness of the observed effect size). In this perspective article, we present some key elements to implementing WR statistics in critical care trials, providing an overview of strengths, drawbacks, and potential applications of this method. To illustrate, we conduct a reevaluation of the HYPO-ECMO (Hypothermia during Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation) trial using the WR framework as a case example.

Use of Aprotinin versus Tranexamic Acid in Cardiac Surgery Patients with High-Risk for Excessive Bleeding (APACHE) trial: a multicentre retrospective comparative non-randomized historical study.

OBJECTIVES: Following the reintroduction of aprotinin into the European market, the French Society of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Anaesthesiologists recommended its prophylactic use at half-dose for high-risk cardiac surgery patients. We examined whether the use of aprotinin instead of tranexamic acid could significantly reduce severe perioperative bleeding. METHODS: This multicentre, retrospective, historical study included cardiac surgery patients treated with aprotinin or tranexamic acid between December 2017 and September 2020. The primary efficacy end point was the severe or massive perioperative bleeding (class 3-4 of the universal definition of perioperative bleeding). The safety secondary end points included the occurrence of thromboembolic events and all-cause mortality within 30 days after surgery. RESULTS: Among the 693 patients included in the study, 347 received aprotinin and 346 took tranexamic acid. The percentage of patients with severe or massive bleeding was similar in the 2 groups (42.1% vs 43.6%, Adjusted odds ratio [ORadj] = 0.87, 95% confidence interval: 0.62-1.23, P = 0.44), as was the perioperative need for blood products (81.0% vs 83.2%, ORadj = 0.75, 95% confidence interval: 0.48-1.17, P = 0.20). However, the median (Interquartile range) 12 h postoperative blood loss was significantly lower in the aprotinin group (383 ml [241-625] vs 450 ml [290-730], P < 0.01). Compared to tranexamic acid, the intraoperative use of aprotinin was associated with increased risk for thromboembolic events (adjusted Hazard ratio 2.30 [95% Cl: 1.06-5.30]; P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Given the modest reduction in blood loss at the expense of a significant increase in thromboembolic adverse events, aprotinin use in high-risk cardiac surgery patients should be based on a carefully considered benefit-risk assessment.

Systemic Hemodynamics, Cardiac Mechanics, and Signaling Pathways Induced by Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in a Cardiogenic Shock Model.

Peripheral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is increasingly being used in patients suffering from refractory cardiogenic shock (CS). Although considered life-saving, peripheral VA-ECMO may also be responsible for intracardiac hemodynamic changes, including left ventricular overload and dysfunction. Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation may also increase myocardial wall stress and stroke work, possibly affecting the cellular cardioprotective and apoptosis signaling pathways, and thus the infarct size. To test this hypothesis, we investigated the effects of increasing the peripheral VA-ECMO blood flow (25-100% of the baseline cardiac output) on systemic and cardiac hemodynamics in a closed-chest CS model. Upon completion of the experiment, the hearts were removed for assessment of infarct size, histology, apoptosis measurements, and phosphorylation statuses of p38 and protein Kinase B (Akt), and extracellular signal-regulated kinase mitogen-activated protein kinases (ERK-MAPK). Peripheral VA-ECMO restored systemic perfusion but induced a significant and blood flow-dependent increase in left ventricular preload and afterload. Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation did not affect infarct size but significantly decreased p38-MAPK phosphorylation and cardiac myocyte apoptosis in the border zone.

Outcomes of left-sided heart valve surgery after heart transplantation: a systematic review.

As the survival after heart transplantation (HTx) is steadily improving, an increasing number of patients with late cardiac pathologies such as valvular disease is expected to rise. Nevertheless, no guidelines for indication of redo cardiac surgery after HTx exists. The aim of the present systematic review is to describe the results reported in the literature of surgical management of severe aortic and/or mitral valve disease. A systematic review was conducted including studies reporting on adult patients with severe mitral or aortic valve pathology needing surgery after their previous HTx. Exclusion criteria consisted in surgery with no left heart valve surgery, concomitant valve surgery during heart transplant, transcatheter interventions, and heterotopic HTx. A total of 35 papers met our inclusion criteria out of 2755 potentially eligible studies with 44 mitral valve surgery patients and 20 aortic valve surgery patients. In the entire population, the mean time from HTx to reintervention was 6.19 ± 5.22 years. After a mean follow-up of 2.78 ± 3.54 years and 1.53 ± 2.26 years from reintervention, 65.6% mitral and 86.7% aortic patients were reported as alive, respectively. As guidelines on cardiac surgery after HTx are currently lacking, left-sided valvular cardiac reinterventions can be considered a possible therapeutic approach in carefully selected patients. These interventions may not only improve the patient's functional status and survival, but may ultimately reduce the need for re-transplantation due to the chronic shortage of donor hearts. However, the support of more robust data is warranted.

Outcomes of tricuspid valve prostheses after heart transplantation: a systematic review.

Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is the most common valvular pathology after heart transplantation (HTx) and endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) remains responsible for the majority of cases due to the high probability of structural valve damage. The aim of the present review was to describe the results of surgical management of severe tricuspid regurgitation through tricuspid valve replacement (TVR) after a previous HTx. A systematic review was conducted by searching Pubmed, ScienceDirect, SciELO, DOAJ, and Cochrane databases until June 2023 for publications reporting patients undergoing TVR surgery after a previous HTx. If no right heart valve surgery was undertaken, or a heterotopic heart transplant was performed, or if the concomitant procedure was performed during the transplant itself, the paper was excluded. Twenty articles met our inclusion criteria out of 1532 potentially eligible studies, with a total of 300 patients. Mean age was 55.1 ± 9.6 years, and 85.1% were male. The mean number of EMB per patient was 31.1 ± 5.5 with a mean time between HTx and TVR of 7.64 ± 3.31 years. Bioprostheses were used in 83.3% of cases and 75.0% of patients with a bioprosthesis were reported as alive at last follow-up. Tricuspid valve repair is a valuable option, but these patients will be susceptible to recurrent TR after EMB. TVR with a bioprosthesis may provide the optimal solution for this subset of patients, as EMB is not feasible with a mechanical valve.

Transcatheter valvular interventions after heart transplantation: A systematic review.

An increasing number of patients experience late valvular disease after heart transplantation (HTx). While mostly being primarily addressed through surgical interventions, transcatheter valve procedures to treat these conditions are rising, particularly for unsuitable surgical candidates. This review aims at analyzing the outcomes of transcatheter valvular procedures in this subset of patients. A systematic review was conducted including studies reporting on adult patients requiring any form of transcatheter valvular intervention after a previous HTx. Studies involving a surgical approach, heterotopic heart transplants, or concomitant procedures performed during the transplant itself were excluded. Twenty-five articles with a total of 33 patients met the inclusion criteria, 10 regarding the aortic valve (14 patients), 5 the mitral valve (6 patients), and 6 the tricuspid valve (13 patients). In two cases, the procedure was recommended to stabilize the valvular lesion before re-transplantation, as both were very young patients. Overall, the mean time from heart transplantation to reintervention was 14.7 ± 9.5 years. The mean follow-up was 15.5 ± 13.5 months, and only one patient died 22.3 months after the intervention. There is a growing emergence of transcatheter interventions for valvular disease after heart transplantation, especially in cases where surgery is deemed high-risk or prohibitive. A different strategy may also be considered in young patients to permit longer allograft life before later re-transplantation. Although encouraging outcomes have been documented, additional research is required to establish the most appropriate approach within this specific subset of patients.

Heparin consumption and inflammatory response according to the coating of cardiopulmonary bypass circuits in cardiac surgery: A retrospective analysis.

INTRODUCTION: There are several types of surface treatments (coatings) aimed at improving the biocompatibility of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) circuit. Some coatings appear to require higher doses of heparin to maintain anticoagulation goals, and some of them might induce postoperative coagulopathy. In this study, we compared the amount of heparin required, postoperative bleeding, and inflammatory response according to three types of coatings. METHOD: We retrospectively included 300 consecutive adult patients who underwent cardiac surgery with CPB and received one of three coatings (Phisio®, Trillium®, and Xcoating™). Our primary objective was to compare, according to coating, the amount of heparin required to maintain an ACT > 400s during CPB. Our secondary objectives were to compare postoperative bleeding for 48 h and CRP rate. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups except for age and preoperative CRP. We did not find a significant difference between the 3 coatings regarding the amount of heparin reinjected. However, we found less postoperative bleeding with the Xcoating™ circuit compared to the Phisio® circuit (-149 mL [-289; -26.5]; p = 0.02) and a lower elevation of CRP with the Phisio® circuit (2.8 times higher than preoperative CRP) compared to Trillium® (4.9 times higher) and Xcoating™ (6.4 times higher); p < 10-3. CONCLUSION: The choice of coating did not influence the amount of heparin required during CPB; however, the post-CPB inflammatory syndrome may be impacted by this choice.

Multidisciplinary cardiogenic shock team approach improves the long-term outcomes of patients suffering from refractory cardiogenic shock treated with short-term mechanical circulatory support.

AIMS: Short-term mechanical circulatory support (STMCS) may be used as an intentional escalation strategy to treat refractory cardiogenic shock (rCS). However, with growing technical possibilities, making the right choice at the right time can be challenging. We established a shock team in January 2013 comprising a cardiac anaesthetist-intensivist, an interventional cardiologist, and a cardiac surgeon. Since then, a diagnosis of rCS has triggered a multidisciplinary team meeting based on a common algorithm. This study aimed to compare the decision-making process for STMCS for rCS before (2007-2013) and after (2013-2019) the creation of the shock team. METHODS AND RESULTS: This before-and-after cohort study was conducted over a 156-month period. Post-cardiotomy rCS were excluded. The primary outcome was a 1-year survival rate. In total, 250 consecutive adult patients were included in the analysis (84 in the control group and 166 in the shock team group). At baseline, the CardShock score was not different between the two groups (5[3-5] vs. 5[4-6], P = 0.323). The 1-year survival rate was significantly higher in the shock team group compared with the control group (59% vs. 45%, P = 0.043). After a Cox regression analysis, the shock team intervention was independently associated with a significantly improved 1-year survival rate (HR: 0.592, 95% CI: 0.398-0.880, P = 0.010). CONCLUSION: A multidisciplinary shock team-based decision for STMCS device implantation in rCS is associated with better 1-year survival rates.

Overview of the current use of levosimendan in France: a prospective observational cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Following the results of randomized controlled trials on levosimendan, French health authorities requested an update of the current use and side-effects of this medication on a national scale. METHOD: The France-LEVO registry was a prospective observational cohort study reflecting the indications, dosing regimens, and side-effects of levosimendan, as well as patient outcomes over a year. RESULTS: The patients included (n = 602) represented 29.6% of the national yearly use of levosimendan in France. They were treated for cardiogenic shock (n = 250, 41.5%), decompensated heart failure (n = 127, 21.1%), cardiac surgery-related low cardiac output prophylaxis and/or treatment (n = 86, 14.3%), and weaning from veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (n = 82, 13.6%). They received 0.18 ± 0.07 µg/kg/min levosimendan over 26 ± 8 h. An initial bolus was administered in 45 patients (7.5%), 103 (17.1%) received repeated infusions, and 461 (76.6%) received inotropes and or vasoactive agents concomitantly. Hypotension was reported in 218 patients (36.2%), atrial fibrillation in 85 (14.1%), and serious adverse events in 17 (2.8%). 136 patients (22.6%) died in hospital, and 26 (4.3%) during the 90-day follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: We observed that levosimendan was used in accordance with recent recommendations by French physicians. Hypotension and atrial fibrillation remained the most frequent side-effects, while serious adverse event potentially attributable to levosimendan were infrequent. The results suggest that this medication was safe and potentially associated with some benefit in the population studied.

Combined Platelet and Red Blood Cell Recovery during On-pump Cardiac Surgery Using same™ by i-SEP Autotransfusion Device: A First-in-human Noncomparative Study (i-TRANSEP Study).

BACKGROUND: Centrifugation-based autotransfusion devices only salvage red blood cells while platelets are removed. The same™ device (Smart Autotransfusion for ME; i-SEP, France) is an innovative filtration-based autotransfusion device able to salvage both red blood cells and platelets. The authors tested the hypothesis that this new device could allow a red blood cell recovery exceeding 80% with a posttreatment hematocrit exceeding 40%, and would remove more than 90% of heparin and 75% of free hemoglobin. METHODS: Adults undergoing on-pump elective cardiac surgery were included in a noncomparative multicenter trial. The device was used intraoperatively to treat shed and residual cardiopulmonary bypass blood. The primary outcome was a composite of cell recovery performance, assessed in the device by red blood cell recovery and posttreatment hematocrit, and of biologic safety assessed in the device by the washout of heparin and free hemoglobin expressed as removal ratios. Secondary outcomes included platelet recovery and function and adverse events (clinical and device-related adverse events) up to 30 days after surgery. RESULTS: The study included 50 patients, of whom 18 (35%) underwent isolated coronary artery bypass graft, 26 (52%) valve surgery, and 6 (12%) aortic root surgery. The median red blood cell recovery per cycle was 86.1% (25th percentile to 75th percentile interquartile range, 80.8 to 91.6) with posttreatment hematocrit of 41.8% (39.7 to 44.2). Removal ratios for heparin and free hemoglobin were 98.9% (98.2 to 99.7) and 94.6% (92.7 to 96.6), respectively. No adverse device effect was reported. Median platelet recovery was 52.4% (44.2 to 60.1), with a posttreatment concentration of 116 (93 to 146) · 109/l. Platelet activation state and function, evaluated by flow cytometry, were found to be unaltered by the device. CONCLUSIONS: In this first-in-human study, the same™ device was able to simultaneously recover and wash both platelets and red blood cells. Compared with preclinical evaluations, the device achieved a higher platelet recovery of 52% with minimal platelet activation while maintaining platelet ability to be activated in vitro.

Perioperative individualized hemodynamic optimization according to baseline mean arterial pressure in cardiac surgery patients: Rationale and design of the OPTIPAM randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative morbidity and mortality after cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) remain high despite recent advances in both anesthesia and perioperative management. Among modifiable risk factors for postoperative complications, optimal arterial pressure during and after surgery has been under debate for years. Recent data suggest that optimizing arterial pressure to the baseline of the patient may improve outcomes. We hypothesize that optimizing the mean arterial pressure (MAP) to the baseline MAP of the patient during cardiac surgery with CPB and during the first 24 hours postoperatively may improve outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: The OPTIPAM trial (NCT05403697) will be a multicenter, randomized, open-label controlled trial testing the superiority of optimized MAP management as compared with a MAP of 65 mm Hg or more during both the intraoperative and postoperative periods in 1,100 patients scheduled for cardiac surgery with CPB. The primary composite end point is the occurrence of acute kidney injury, neurological complications including stroke or postoperative delirium, and death. The secondary end points are hospital and intensive care unit lengths of stay, Day 7 and Day 90 mortality, postoperative cognitive dysfunction on Day 7 and Day 90, and quality of life at Day 7 and Day 90. Two interim analyses will assess the safety of the intervention. CONCLUSION: The OPTIPAM trial will assess the effectiveness of an individualized target of mean arterial pressure in cardiac surgery with CPB in reducing postoperative morbidity. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT05403697.

Impact of previous REnal TRansplantation on the mid-term renal Outcome after CARdiac surgery: the RETROCAR trial.

BACKGROUND: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is one of the most common complications after cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Renal transplant recipients (RTRs) have a higher risk of cardiac surgery-associated AKI (CSA-AKI). A relationship has been strongly suggested between AKI and poor long-term graft survival. The main objective was to evaluate the impact of on-pump cardiac surgery on the 1-year renal allograft survival rate. METHODS: The study population consisted of 37 RTRs and 56 non-RTRs who underwent cardiac surgery between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2019. They were matched according to age, sex, preoperative glomerular function, diabetes and type of surgery. The primary composite outcome was renal survival, defined as patient survival without the requirement for permanent dialysis or new kidney transplantation at 1 year after surgery. RESULTS: The renal survival rate was significantly lower in the RTR group than in the non-RTR group [81% versus 96%; odds ratio 0.16 (95% confidence interval 0.03-0.82), P = .03]. The proportion of patients who returned to permanent dialysis was higher in the RTR group than in the non-RTR group (12% versus 0%; P = .02). The proportion of patients with severe AKI was also higher in the RTR group. At 1 year after surgery, serum creatinine level, glomerular filtration rate and all-cause mortality rates were comparable between both groups. CONCLUSION: Patients with a functional renal allograft have a low 1-year renal allograft survival rate after cardiac surgery with CPB. In addition, these patients have significant risks of AKI and acute kidney disease after open-heart surgery.

Effect of oral antimicrobial prophylaxis on surgical site infection after elective colorectal surgery: multicentre, randomised, double blind, placebo controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether oral antimicrobial prophylaxis as an adjunct to intravenous antibiotic prophylaxis reduces surgical site infections after elective colorectal surgery. DESIGN: Multicentre, randomised, double blind, placebo controlled trial. SETTING: 11 university and non-university hospitals in France between 25 May 2016 and 8 August 2019. PARTICIPANTS: 926 adults scheduled for elective colorectal surgery. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomised to receive either a single 1 g dose of ornidazole (n=463) or placebo (n=463) orally 12 hours before surgery, in addition to intravenous antimicrobial prophylaxis before surgical incision. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with surgical site infection within 30 days after surgery. Secondary outcomes included individual types of surgical site infections and major postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo classification grade 3 or higher) within 30 days after surgery. RESULTS: Of the 960 patients who were enrolled, 926 (96%) were included in the analysis. The mean age of participants was 63 years and 554 (60%) were men. Surgical site infection within 30 days after surgery occurred in 60 of 463 patients (13%) in the oral prophylaxis group and 100 of 463 (22%) in the placebo group (absolute difference -8.6%, 95% confidence interval -13.5% to -3.8%; relative risk 0.60, 95% confidence interval 0.45 to 0.80). The proportion of patients with deep infections was 4.8% in the oral prophylaxis group and 8.0% in the placebo group (absolute difference -3.2%, 95% confidence interval -6.4% to -0.1%). The proportion of patients with organ space infections was 5.0% in the oral prophylaxis group and 8.4% in the placebo group (absolute difference -3.4%, -6.7% to -0.2%). Major postoperative complications occurred in 9.1% patients in the oral prophylaxis group and 13.6% in the placebo group (absolute difference -4.5%, -8.6% to -0.5%). CONCLUSION: Among adults undergoing elective colorectal surgery, the addition of a single 1 g dose of ornidazole compared with placebo before surgery significantly reduced surgical site infections. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02618720.

Serum lactate and acute mesenteric ischaemia: An observational, controlled multicentre study.

BACKGROUND: Early diagnosis and prompt management of acute mesenteric ischaemia (AMI) are key to survival but remain extremely difficult, due to vague and non-specific symptoms. Serum lactate (SL) is commonly presented as a useful biomarker for the diagnosis or prognosis of AMI. The aim of our study was test SL (1) as a diagnostic marker and (2) as a prognostic marker for AMI. STUDY DESIGN: This was an ancillary multicentre case-control study. Patients with AMI at intensive care unit (ICU) admission were included (AMI group) and matched to ICU patients without AMI (control group). SL was measured and compared on day 0 (D0) and day 1 (D1). Diagnosis and prognosis accuracy were assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and their area under the curve (AUC). RESULTS: Each group consisted of 137 matched ICU patients. There was no significant difference of SL between the two groups at D0 or at D1 (p = 0.26 and p = 0.29 respectively). SL was a poor marker of AMI: at D0 and D1, AUC were respectively 0.57 [0.51; 0.63] and 0.60 [0.53; 0.67]. SL at D0 and D1 correctly predicted ICU mortality, independently of AMI (AUC D0: 0.69 [0.59; 0.79] vs. 0.74 [0.65; 0.82]; p = 0.51 and D1: 0.74 [0.64; 0.84] vs. 0.76 [0.66; 0.87]; p = 0.77, respectively, for control and AMI groups]. CONCLUSIONS: SL has no specific link with AMI, both for diagnosis and prognosis. SL should not be used for the diagnosis of AMI but, despite its lack of specificity, it may help to assess severity.

Use and safety of aprotinin in routine clinical practice: A European postauthorisation safety study conducted in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

BACKGROUND: Aprotinin has been used to reduce blood loss and blood product transfusions in patients at high risk of major blood loss during cardiac surgery. Approval by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) for its current indication is limited to patients at high risk of major blood loss undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass graft surgery (iCABG). OBJECTIVE: To report current real-world data on the use and certain endpoints related to the safety of aprotinin in adult patients. DESIGN: The Nordic aprotinin patient registry (NAPaR) received data from 83 European centres in a noninterventional, postauthorisation safety study (PASS) performed at the request of the EMA. SETTING: Cardiac surgical centres committed to enrolling patients in the NAPaR. PATIENTS: Patients receiving aprotinin agreeing to participate. INTERVENTION: The decision to administer aprotinin was made by the treating physicians. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Aprotinin safety endpoints were in-hospital death, thrombo-embolic events (TEEs), specifically stroke, renal impairment, re-exploration for bleeding/tamponade. RESULTS: From 2016 to 2020, 5309 patients (male 71.5%; >75 years 18.9%) were treated with aprotinin; 1363 (25.7%) underwent iCABG and 3946 (74.3%) another procedure, including a surgical treatment for aortic dissection ( n  = 660, 16.7%); 54.5% of patients received the full-dose regimen. In-hospital mortality in iCABG patients was 1.3% (95% CI, 0.66 to 1.84%) vs. 8.3% (7.21 to 8.91%) in non-iCABG patients; incidence of TEEs and postoperative rise in creatinine level greater than 44 µmol l -1 2.3% (1.48 to 3.07%) and 2.7% (1.79 to 3.49%) vs. 7.2% (6.20 to 7.79%) and 15.5% (13.84 to 16.06%); patients undergoing re-exploration for bleeding 1.4% (0.71 to 1.93%) vs. 3.0% (2.39 to 3.44%). Twelve cases of hypersensitivity/anaphylactic reaction (0.2%) were reported as Adverse Drug Reactions. CONCLUSION: The data in the NApaR indicated that in this patient population, at high risk of death or blood loss undergoing cardiac surgery, including complex cardiac surgeries other than iCABG, the incidence of adverse events is in line with data from current literature, where aprotinin was not used. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EU PAS register number: EUPAS11384.

Guidelines on enhanced recovery after cardiac surgery under cardiopulmonary bypass or off-pump.

OBJECTIVE: To provide recommendations for enhanced recovery after cardiac surgery (ERACS) based on a multimodal perioperative medicine approach in adult cardiac surgery patients with the aim of improving patient satisfaction, reducing postoperative mortality and morbidity, and reducing the length of hospital stay. DESIGN: A consensus committee of 20 experts from the French Society of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine (Société française d'anesthésie et de réanimation, SFAR) and the French Society of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (Société française de chirurgie thoracique et cardio-vasculaire, SFCTCV) was convened. A formal conflict-of-interest policy was developed at the onset of the process and enforced throughout. The entire guideline process was conducted independently of any industry funding. The authors were advised to follow the principles of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system to guide the assessment of the quality of evidence. METHODS: Six fields were defined: (1) selection of the patient pathway and its information; (2) preoperative management and rehabilitation; (3) anaesthesia and analgesia for cardiac surgery; (4) surgical strategy for cardiac surgery and bypass management; (5) patient blood management; and (6) postoperative enhanced recovery. For each field, the objective of the recommendations was to answer questions formulated according to the PICO model (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome). Based on these questions, an extensive bibliographic search was carried out and analyses were performed using the GRADE approach. The recommendations were formulated according to the GRADE methodology and then voted on by all the experts according to the GRADE grid method. RESULTS: The SFAR/SFCTCV guideline panel provided 33 recommendations on the management of patients undergoing cardiac surgery under cardiopulmonary bypass or off-pump. After three rounds of voting and several amendments, a strong agreement was reached for the 33 recommendations. Of these recommendations, 10 have a high level of evidence (7 GRADE 1+ and 3 GRADE 1-); 19 have a moderate level of evidence (15 GRADE 2+ and 4 GRADE 2-); and 4 are expert opinions. Finally, no recommendations were provided for 3 questions. CONCLUSIONS: Strong agreement existed among the experts to provide recommendations to optimise the complete perioperative management of patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

Glycaemic Variability and Hyperglycaemia as Prognostic Markers of Major Cardiovascular Events in Diabetic Patients Hospitalised in Cardiology Intensive Care Unit for Acute Heart Failure.

(1) Background: Hyperglycaemia and hypoglycaemia are both emerging risk factors for cardiovascular disease. Nevertheless, the potential effect of glycaemic variability (GV) on mid-term major cardiovascular events (MACE) in diabetic patients presenting with acute heart failure (AHF) remains unclear. This study investigates the prognostic value of GV in diabetic patients presenting with acute heart failure (AHF). (2) Methods: this was an observational study including consecutive patients with diabetes and AHF between January 2015 and November 2016. GV was calculated using standard deviation of glycaemia values during initial hospitalisation in the intensive cardiac care unit. MACE, including recurrent AHF, new-onset myocardial infarction, ischaemic stroke and cardiac death, were recorded. The predictive effects of GV on patient outcomes were analysed with respect to baseline characteristics and cardiac status. (3) Results: In total, 392 patients with diabetes and AHF were enrolled. During follow-up (median (interquartile range) 29 (6−51) months), MACE occurred in 227 patients (57.9%). In total, 92 patients died of cardiac causes (23.5%), 107 were hospitalised for heart failure (27.3%), 19 had new-onset myocardial infarction (4.8%) and 9 (2.3%) had an ischaemic stroke. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that GV > 50 mg/dL (2.70 mmol/L), age > 75 years, reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF < 30%) and female gender were independent predictors of MACE: hazard ratios (HR) of 3.16 (2.25−4.43; p < 0.001), 1.54 (1.14−2.08; p = 0.005), 1.47 (1.06−2.07; p = 0.02) and 1.43 (1.05−1.94; p = 0.03), respectively. (4) Conclusions: among other well-known factors of HF, a GV cut-off value of >50 mg/dL was the strongest independent predictive factor for mid-term MACE in patients with diabetes and AHF.